Review



fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. nucleatum knorr  (ATCC)


Bioz Verified Symbol ATCC is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol ATCC manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 97

    Structured Review

    ATCC fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. nucleatum knorr
    Fusobacterium Nucleatum Subsp. Nucleatum Knorr, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1744 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. nucleatum knorr/product/ATCC
    Average 97 stars, based on 1744 article reviews
    fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. nucleatum knorr - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    97/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    97
    ATCC fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. nucleatum knorr
    Fusobacterium Nucleatum Subsp. Nucleatum Knorr, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. nucleatum knorr/product/ATCC
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. nucleatum knorr - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    97/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    ATCC fusobacterium nucleatum
    Fusobacterium Nucleatum, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/fusobacterium nucleatum/product/ATCC
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    fusobacterium nucleatum - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    97
    ATCC guangdong microbial culture collection center
    Guangdong Microbial Culture Collection Center, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/guangdong microbial culture collection center/product/ATCC
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    guangdong microbial culture collection center - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    97/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    97
    ATCC fusobacterium nucleatum subsp nucleatum
    Endpoint OD600 of <t>Fusobacterium</t> <t>nucleatum</t> at 25.5 h across polyol concentrations. Bars show mean ± SD ( n = 3). Different letters within a concentration indicate Tukey’s HSD groupings ( p < 0.05). The dashed line indicates the untreated control mean. The untreated control mean OD was 1.070 +/− 0.485, whereas that of erythritol 1% was 1.823 +/− 0.163 and that of erythritol 2% was 1.413 +/− 0.374; for D-mannose 1%, the mean OD was 1.577 +/− 0.091, and for D-mannose 2%, it was 1.427 +/− 0.087.
    Fusobacterium Nucleatum Subsp Nucleatum, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/fusobacterium nucleatum subsp nucleatum/product/ATCC
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    fusobacterium nucleatum subsp nucleatum - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    97/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    ATCC f nucleatum subsp nucleatum strain vpi 4355
    A) Alpha diversity (Observed richness, Shannon index) in tumor vs. non-tumor samples (n = 32, 31), and tumors stratified by location (right, n = 16; left, n = 16) or stage (early, n = 22; late, n = 10). B) Differential abundance analysis at the species level comparing tumor vs non-tumor (left), right vs left tumor (middle), and early vs late stage tumor (right). Volcano plots highlight significantly enriched taxa (FDR < 0.05). C) Phylum-level taxonomic composition in tumor and non-tumor tissues, showing enrichment of Fusobacteriota in tumors. D) Genus-level composition of tumors stratified by <t>Fusobacterium</t> <t>nucleatum</t> detection by qPCR (positive vs. negative). E) Top species enriched in tumors from African (AFRg) and European (EURg) ancestry patients (n = 68, WGS); dot size reflects significance (–log10 FDR); colors denote ancestry specificity (red = AFR only, purple = shared). F) Oral-origin taxa significantly enriched in tumors based on presence/absence data and annotation using the Human Oral Microbiome Database (HOMD v16.01). Bar length indicates log2 odds ratio of presence in tumor vs non-tumor (Fisher’s exact test). 16S rRNA sequencing was performed in a sub-cohort of 32 patients (A–D), and WGS in 68 patients (E–F) from the P-1000 cohort.
    F Nucleatum Subsp Nucleatum Strain Vpi 4355, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/f nucleatum subsp nucleatum strain vpi 4355/product/ATCC
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    f nucleatum subsp nucleatum strain vpi 4355 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    97
    ATCC fusobacterium nucleatum subsp nucleatum atcc 25586
    A) Alpha diversity (Observed richness, Shannon index) in tumor vs. non-tumor samples (n = 32, 31), and tumors stratified by location (right, n = 16; left, n = 16) or stage (early, n = 22; late, n = 10). B) Differential abundance analysis at the species level comparing tumor vs non-tumor (left), right vs left tumor (middle), and early vs late stage tumor (right). Volcano plots highlight significantly enriched taxa (FDR < 0.05). C) Phylum-level taxonomic composition in tumor and non-tumor tissues, showing enrichment of Fusobacteriota in tumors. D) Genus-level composition of tumors stratified by <t>Fusobacterium</t> <t>nucleatum</t> detection by qPCR (positive vs. negative). E) Top species enriched in tumors from African (AFRg) and European (EURg) ancestry patients (n = 68, WGS); dot size reflects significance (–log10 FDR); colors denote ancestry specificity (red = AFR only, purple = shared). F) Oral-origin taxa significantly enriched in tumors based on presence/absence data and annotation using the Human Oral Microbiome Database (HOMD v16.01). Bar length indicates log2 odds ratio of presence in tumor vs non-tumor (Fisher’s exact test). 16S rRNA sequencing was performed in a sub-cohort of 32 patients (A–D), and WGS in 68 patients (E–F) from the P-1000 cohort.
    Fusobacterium Nucleatum Subsp Nucleatum Atcc 25586, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/fusobacterium nucleatum subsp nucleatum atcc 25586/product/ATCC
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    fusobacterium nucleatum subsp nucleatum atcc 25586 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    97/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Endpoint OD600 of Fusobacterium nucleatum at 25.5 h across polyol concentrations. Bars show mean ± SD ( n = 3). Different letters within a concentration indicate Tukey’s HSD groupings ( p < 0.05). The dashed line indicates the untreated control mean. The untreated control mean OD was 1.070 +/− 0.485, whereas that of erythritol 1% was 1.823 +/− 0.163 and that of erythritol 2% was 1.413 +/− 0.374; for D-mannose 1%, the mean OD was 1.577 +/− 0.091, and for D-mannose 2%, it was 1.427 +/− 0.087.

    Journal: Microorganisms

    Article Title: In Vitro Inhibition of Pathogens by Polyols: Optical Density-Based Screening and Implications for the Oral–Systemic Axis

    doi: 10.3390/microorganisms14040884

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Endpoint OD600 of Fusobacterium nucleatum at 25.5 h across polyol concentrations. Bars show mean ± SD ( n = 3). Different letters within a concentration indicate Tukey’s HSD groupings ( p < 0.05). The dashed line indicates the untreated control mean. The untreated control mean OD was 1.070 +/− 0.485, whereas that of erythritol 1% was 1.823 +/− 0.163 and that of erythritol 2% was 1.413 +/− 0.374; for D-mannose 1%, the mean OD was 1.577 +/− 0.091, and for D-mannose 2%, it was 1.427 +/− 0.087.

    Article Snippet: The following microorganisms were evaluated: Streptococcus mutans (ATCC 25175), Streptococcus anginosus (ATCC 700231), Candida albicans (ATCC 18804), and Fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. nucleatum (ATCC 23726).

    Techniques: Concentration Assay, Control

    A) Alpha diversity (Observed richness, Shannon index) in tumor vs. non-tumor samples (n = 32, 31), and tumors stratified by location (right, n = 16; left, n = 16) or stage (early, n = 22; late, n = 10). B) Differential abundance analysis at the species level comparing tumor vs non-tumor (left), right vs left tumor (middle), and early vs late stage tumor (right). Volcano plots highlight significantly enriched taxa (FDR < 0.05). C) Phylum-level taxonomic composition in tumor and non-tumor tissues, showing enrichment of Fusobacteriota in tumors. D) Genus-level composition of tumors stratified by Fusobacterium nucleatum detection by qPCR (positive vs. negative). E) Top species enriched in tumors from African (AFRg) and European (EURg) ancestry patients (n = 68, WGS); dot size reflects significance (–log10 FDR); colors denote ancestry specificity (red = AFR only, purple = shared). F) Oral-origin taxa significantly enriched in tumors based on presence/absence data and annotation using the Human Oral Microbiome Database (HOMD v16.01). Bar length indicates log2 odds ratio of presence in tumor vs non-tumor (Fisher’s exact test). 16S rRNA sequencing was performed in a sub-cohort of 32 patients (A–D), and WGS in 68 patients (E–F) from the P-1000 cohort.

    Journal: medRxiv

    Article Title: Integrative Genomic, Transcriptomic, and Microbiome Profiles of Colon Cancer by Ancestry Provide Insights into Molecular Distinctions

    doi: 10.64898/2026.03.25.26349226

    Figure Lengend Snippet: A) Alpha diversity (Observed richness, Shannon index) in tumor vs. non-tumor samples (n = 32, 31), and tumors stratified by location (right, n = 16; left, n = 16) or stage (early, n = 22; late, n = 10). B) Differential abundance analysis at the species level comparing tumor vs non-tumor (left), right vs left tumor (middle), and early vs late stage tumor (right). Volcano plots highlight significantly enriched taxa (FDR < 0.05). C) Phylum-level taxonomic composition in tumor and non-tumor tissues, showing enrichment of Fusobacteriota in tumors. D) Genus-level composition of tumors stratified by Fusobacterium nucleatum detection by qPCR (positive vs. negative). E) Top species enriched in tumors from African (AFRg) and European (EURg) ancestry patients (n = 68, WGS); dot size reflects significance (–log10 FDR); colors denote ancestry specificity (red = AFR only, purple = shared). F) Oral-origin taxa significantly enriched in tumors based on presence/absence data and annotation using the Human Oral Microbiome Database (HOMD v16.01). Bar length indicates log2 odds ratio of presence in tumor vs non-tumor (Fisher’s exact test). 16S rRNA sequencing was performed in a sub-cohort of 32 patients (A–D), and WGS in 68 patients (E–F) from the P-1000 cohort.

    Article Snippet: For absolute quantification, microbial genomic DNA of F. nucleatum subsp. nucleatum strain VPI 4355 (ATCC # 25586D-5) was used to prepare the standard curve and as a positive control; the negative control was sterile H 2 O.

    Techniques: Sequencing